Xu Cui's Homepage
Resume
Research
eCourse
Personal
Contact
::::: Home ::::
1. Neural correlates of motor preparation

Project: fMRI study of motor preparation
Principal Investigator: P. Read Montague
Collaborators: David Eagleman (Baylor College of Medicine)
Chess Stetson (Caltech)

What happens when the brain awaits a signal of uncertain arrival time, as when a sprinter waits for the starting pistol? We here report a novel type of neural signature: blood flow in the supplementary motor area remains at baseline during the readiness period and then rises only after the 'go' signal. The amplitude of this delayed response depends on the length of the preceding readiness period: longer preparation causes higher blood flow. The dependence of the amplitude on the readiness period is not a consequence of motor output, but is equally evident in no-go conditions. The amplitude is modulated by expectations of the arrival time of the go signal, appearing to encode a cumulative conditional probability (also known as the cumulative hazard function). This encoding is not dependent on modality, operating in the same manner with auditory and visual signals. We suggest that anticipation of a temporally uncertain signal leads to an increasing energy debt which must be "paid back" with blood flow after the readiness period has ended.

2. Neural correlates of visual imagery vividness

Project: fMRI study of motor preparation
Principal Investigator: P. Read Montague
Collaborators: David Eagleman (Baylor College of Medicine)
Cameron Jeter (University of Texas, Houston), Dongni Yang (Baylor College of Medicine)

When asked to imagine a visual scene, such as an ant crawling on a checkered table cloth toward a jar of jelly, individuals subjectively report different vividness in their mental visualization. Can we measure such vividness objectively? We show that reported vividness is correlated with the early visual cortex activity relative to the whole brain activity measured by fMRI: the higher visual cortex activity is, the more vivid the imagery is.

Cui, X., Jeter, C.B., Yang, D., Montague, P.R., and Eagleman, D.M. (2007) Vividness of mental imagery: individual variability can be measured objectively. Vision Research 47, 474-478  link to full text

3. Temporal Perception

Project: fMRI study of temporal order reversal illusion
Principal Investigator: P. Read Montague
Collaborators: David Eagleman (University of Texas, Houston)
Chess Stetson (University of Texas, Houston)

To judge causality, organisms must determine the temporal order of their actions and sensations. However, this judgment may be confounded by changing delays in sensory pathways, suggesting the need for dynamic temporal recalibration. To test for such a mechanism, we artificially injected a fixed delay between participants¡¯ actions (keypresses) and subsequent sensations (flashes). After participants adapted to this delay, flashes at unexpectedly short delays after the keypress were often perceived as occurring before the keypress, demonstrating a recalibration of motor-sensory temporal order judgments. When participants experienced illusory reversals, fMRI BOLD signals increased in anterior cingulate cortex/medial frontal cortex (ACC/MFC), a brain region previously implicated in conflict monitoring. This illusion-specific activation suggests that the brain maintains not only a recalibrated representation of timing, but also a less-plastic representation against which to compare it.

Stetson, C., Cui, X.*, Montague, P.R., and Eagleman, D.M. (2006). Motor-sensory recalibration leads to an illusory reversal of action and sensation. Neuron 5, 651-659.
*parallel first author  link to full text


4. Dopamine model

Project: Extracellular dopamine dynamics model
Principal Investigator: P. Read Montague
Collaborators: John Dani, Fuming Zhou

Information encoded as spike trains (digital signal) is decoded as extracelluar dopamine concentration fluctuation (analog signal) in dopamine neurons. What is the decoding method, what is the decoding mechanisms and why does nature favor this decoding mechanism? To answer these questions, we built an extracellular dopamine dynamics model and fitted the model to in-vivo data. We plan to fit the model to the in-vitro data collected in Dani lab.

5. Extracellular calcium signaling

Project: Fisher information of cleft calcium signal
Principal Investigator: P. Read Montague

Cleft calcium concentration significantly drops as a consequence of calcium influx during an action potential at presynaptic bouton. This drop occurs even if the neurotransmitter is not released. Is neurotransmitter release failure a waste? Is the calcium drop a signal and how good is this signal? We plan to answer this question by calculating the fisher information of this cleft calcium signal.

6. Energy usage efficiency in neural signaling

Why is the amplitude of an action potential is 100 mV? Both information and energy might have shaped the size of action potentials during evolution.

Previous Projects...

 

Copyright © 2004 Xu Cui, All Rights Reserved Site Meter